BLOG

Bozeman udtrykker metodologierne for hvordan.

1
BLOG

Public Values and Public Interest

2

Bozeman udtrykker metodologierne for, hvordan åben interessehypotese skal koncentreres i bogens midterste segment. Bozeman navngiver disse metoder som regulerende, interaktion og konsensualist. Regularisering er den fælles faktor for den skiftende offentlige interesse. Cycle see er lavet af tre sektioner, idet det er proceduremæssigt, totalt eller strukturer på grund af rivalisering mellem svingende interesser. Den sidste metode, konsensualist, er den mest retfærdige af de mange tilgange. Mærkeligt nok præciserer Bozeman, at hypotesen om offentlig interesse kan fungere uadskilleligt med forsigtige metoder med den begrundelse, at der er mødefokus mellem de to. For eksempel ønsker begge at udvide et incitament til enten deres investorer eller beboere. Under alle omstændigheder gør tvetydigheden af ​​hypotesen om offentlig interesse det subpari sammenlignet med det solide bevis for, at monetær undersøgelse frembringer.

Bozeman har koordineret bogen for at give de grundlæggende principper for offentlig præmiehypotese, på det tidspunkt følger med en samtale mellem åben indtægtshypotese og markedshypotese, lukker sidst bogen med en nyttig hypotese, han lavede kaldet Public Value Mapping Model (PVM). Denne model er i det væsentlige et apparat, der kan bruges i forbindelse med monetær undersøgelse til at afgøre offentlig værdi. PVM er i matrixstruktur med fire kvadranter til indstilling af forskellige offentlige kvaliteter. Modellen afdækker fire vigtige kvaliteter af offentlige og private tilgange. PVM afdækker, hvis disse strategier er solide eller svage for så vidt angår offentlig fiasko, offentlig succes, markedssvigt og markedssucces. Bozeman lukker vidunderligt offentlige værdier og offentlig interesse: Modvægtning af økonomisk individualisme med de ægte tilfælde af anvendelse af den omstridte og måske usikre forekomst af genetisk modificerede organismer (GMO’er) og specifikt arveligt ændrede frø, der producerer en betydelig del af verdens fødevareforsyning. Han viser, hvordan åben bekymring og sandsynligvis virksomhedshensyn har foranlediget dannelsen af ​​GURT, ellers kendt som eliminatorens kvalitet. Rammen afslører, at der er mulighed for at blive bedre for GURT, da det er en skuffelse på markedet og en offentlig præstation.

Offentlige værdier og offentlig interesse: Modvægtning af økonomisk individualisme er fyldt med betydelige definitioner, modeller, offentlig interesse nærmer sig, øvelser af offentlig administration (NPM og nytænkning af offentlige forvaltninger) og endda et ekstremt nyttigt apparat i PVM-modellen. Bozeman har ikke alle øremærkerne til at være politisk ensidig mod nogen vej; på trods af hvad man kunne forvente, viser han virkelig hele bogen fordelene ved at bruge markedsindflydelser til at håndtere den offentlige præmie. Det er klart, at det er grunden til, at billedteksten kaldes Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Bozeman udleder grundlæggende, at økonomisk individualisme kan være usikker i missionen for at give de bedste fordele til den samlede befolkning. Ikke desto mindre tager han ikke den holdning, som økonomisk individualisme hindrer vores brede offentlighed.

Read More

Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism is an exceptional scholastic magnum opus by Barry Bozeman that gives a profound and convincing comprehension of what contains public qualities, public interest, public products, the public space, and clarifies with insightful models, on methods of dealing with the public interest with a term he instituted “overseeing freeness”. The contention that Bozeman amasses is that everybody’s voice can and ought to be heard in deciding the public interest. Which is all well and good, he proceeds to clarify the term in detail. “An ideal public interest alludes to those out-comes best serving the since a long time ago run endurance and prosperity of a social aggregate interpreted as a “public”. This book was assembled with numerous genuine analogies for aiding understudies, and anybody besides, (particularly those that address people in general in policy management, and different other political situations) in the journey for making public approaches that are not overwhelmingly based off financial matters, but instead what Bozeman has named “public qualities”. Bozeman proceeds to express that public qualities are the regularizing agreement of rights, advantages, and privileges in which all residents ought to be qualified for, and these public worth standards ought to coordinate the course in which public arrangements are made.

Bozeman gives the beginning of public interest hypothesis starting with the philosophical psyche of Aristotle, yet doesn’t stop there. Bozeman’s rundowns St. Thomas Aquinas, and John Locke, as making commitments out in the open interest hypothesis as far back as the main thousand years. In addition, Bozeman proposes that public interest hypothesis is stale, as a course of study, in contemporary occasions, in light of the fact that financial examinations (which are quantitative and conduct based) fit better with the way of thinking of monetary independence. With a greater amount of the economies of the world being based off monetary independence, everybody gets the opportunity to aggregate riches. So, monetary independence could be moving the other way of public interest hypothesis. Indeed, even with public organizations re-appropriating obligations to private firms, there might be a purpose behind society to zero in on open interest hypothesis again on the grounds that private firms have the chance of “quieting” the public voice and assuming control over the public interest. Bozeman spreads out the idea of “freeness” just like an approach to characterize a private firm or even a public organization, rather than characterizing each by its specific financial area. In Bozeman’s language, freeness alludes to the degree a firm or office is obliged by political position, while “privateness” alludes to the control market influences have on the organization or private firm. In result to the privatization that has happened as of late, New Public Management (NPM) has become a significant method of permitting market influences to help deal with the public premium. Bozeman brings up the historical backdrop of NPM and how NPM utilizes a considerable lot of the practices that private endeavors use to reduce expenses, similar to lean bookkeeping, and contracting out occupation works, that generally would be uneconomical for the parent office to keep up.

Read More